WINNERS AND LOSERS
- Garry S Sklar
- Feb 15, 2021
- 3 min read
In sports events, there are definite winners and losers. Last week the Tampa Bay
Buccaneers decisively beat the Kansas City Chiefs 31-9 in Super Bowl LV. However, in
the game of politics and indeed in life, sometimes, it is not so easy to determine who
really wins and who loses.
Looking at American presidential elections we can see this point quite clearly. In 1932,
Franklin D. Roosevelt won the election over incumbent President Herbert Hoover. True,
FDR won, but we can just as correctly say that Hoover lost. Anyone could have beaten
Hoover as he presided over the stock market crash and the subsequent depression
with an ineffective government. FDR was subsequently re-elected three more times
before dying in the first year of his fourth term (1945). His successor, Harry Truman won
election in 1948, and he was succeeded by Dwight Eisenhower, the World War II hero
who won two terms.
John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon won elections. Nixon was the
only President in American history to resign and Gerald Ford became the only
unelected president. Ford, colorless and totally lacking charisma lost the election of
1976 to Jimmy Carter. Carter didn’t truly win the election. He was similar to FDR in
1932 in the sense that Ford lost. After Nixon’s Watergate scandal, any candidate could
have beaten Ford. Four years later, the inept Carter, burdened by severe uncontrolled
inflation and the Iran hostage crisis lost to Ronald Reagan. Immensely popular, Reagan
didn’t win as much as Carter lost. Reagan easily won re-election as did his successors,
George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton.
The new century saw George W. Bush win over Al Gore. Bush presided over disastrous
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq yet his opponent John Kerry lost the election of 2004 to
Bush as he and his running mate, John Edwards never were able to arouse any
enthusiasm for their campaign. Eight years of George W. Bush were enough for the
American voter. Continuing wars, and a near financial collapse in 2008 doomed any
Republican chance for the White House in 2008 and a freshman senator from Illinois,
Barack Obama, easily beat John McCain whose time to run for president had already
passed. Obama easily won re-election in 2012.
Most recently, in 2016 and 2020, candidates lost the election, the winners being more
accidental and thus benefitting from the unpopularity of their opponents. The Democrat
nominee in 2016, Hillary Clinton, even though having served as First Lady, Senator
from NY and Secretary of State was vastly unpopular. She ran a poor campaign, failing
to visit key industrial states that tend Democratic in elections, unknowingly ceding
victory to her opponent, Donald J. Trump, who in a sense won by default. Trump
similarly lost the election of 2020 to Joseph R. Biden Jr., a career Washington politician
who served as Obama’s Vice President. Widely unpopular, Trump dealt poorly with the
Covid pandemic inducing a field of over twenty Democrats to seek their party’s
nomination. The election was Trump’s to lose. Though supported by a broad base of
voters, his poor record over his term and equally unpresidential behavior was enough
to sink him. Trump lost the election of 2020.
The purpose of this essay is to caution against triumphalism. “Winners” should be
modest in their victory as in many instances they didn’t win as much as their opponent
lost. Yet even winners who won only because their opponents lost have the possibility
of performing well and winning when they run for re-election. Hopefully, incumbents
will remember these points and serve the nation well. Indeed, they will be winners
when the nation is the winner.
Garry S. Sklar
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 14, 2021
Comments